On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:46:01 +0000, Nigel Frankcom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 01:23:59 -0500, Theo Van Dinter ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 09:11:08PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> Is there some process that needs to be automated to ship out the 3.1 >>> branch rules changes via sa-update? >> >>At the moment, we push out the updates manually. It could be automated (I >>already have a script that does 95% of it, which I currently run manually,) >>but I think 3.1 will probably stay manual for a while. >> >>3.2 has automatic updates, which some of us (ok, at least me,) is still not >>too sure about. >> >>> I know I've seen commits to branches/3.1, but no sa-update since 12/19.... >> >>Actually, I pushed an update yesterday evening. :P >> >>Generally, updates get put in, and then whenever someone feels like pushing >>it, they can. I usually put in small commits for specific sets of rules, and >>could do multiple edits before I want an update to occur. > >Is anyone else having problems updating with sa-update? Mine's exiting >with code 4 - Full details below.... > >Kind Regards & a Happy New Year to all. > >Nigel > > <snip> >>[15939] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 4 No, you didn't miss a version update. That was the 1st thing I checked when I saw the 3.002 references. I think Theo may have got his dev tree's mixed up, or maybe a little too much Xmas spirit ;-D Nigel
