Alexander Veit wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > [...] > > Not really. It's actually a fairly good system if you have an IMAP > > server. > > > > You create IMAP folders for spam and ham. These can be shared or > > individual for each user. The users then copy any mis-categorized > > mail to these folders. A program on the SpamAssassin server > > connects to the IMAP server, copies the messages from these > > folders, and runs sa-learn on them. [...] > > OK, not so bad :-) > > However, our incoming mail gateway that runs SA is located in the DMZ, > whereas user mailboxes are on severs that belong to the internal > network. I think in this scenario it's easier to work with spam > reporting mails and the scipts that where posted by Bret Miller and > Dan Horn.
You could always set a firewall rule to allow IMAP connections to your internal boxes from the SA box only. I tend to think that the IMAP solution would be less likely to cause changes to the message. Even forwarding as an attachment can causes some parts of the message to change. Also, the IMAP folders would probably be easier for the users. For me, "forward-as-attachment" is a difficult concept for most of my users. (not to mention being hard to do properly with Outlook) -- Bowie
