Both of my systems reported:

Subroutine __CTYPE_HTML_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_ratware.cf, rule __CTYPE_HTML,
line 6.
Subroutine __FROM_EBAY_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/80_additional.cf, rule __FROM_EBAY,
line 6.
Subroutine __HAS_RCVD_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_compensate.cf, rule __HAS_RCVD,
line 6.
Subroutine __THEBAT_MUA_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_ratware.cf, rule __THEBAT_MUA,
line 6.
Subroutine SUBJECT_DIET_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_head_tests.cf, rule SUBJECT_DIET,
line 6.
Subroutine __AOL_FROM_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_ratware.cf, rule __AOL_FROM, line
6.
Subroutine FROM_BLANK_NAME_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_head_tests.cf, rule
FROM_BLANK_NAME, line 6.
Subroutine __CT_TEXT_PLAIN_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_head_tests.cf, rule
__CT_TEXT_PLAIN, line 6.
Subroutine __MIME_VERSION_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_head_tests.cf, rule
__MIME_VERSION, line 6.
Subroutine __RATWARE_0_TZ_DATE_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_ratware.cf, rule
__RATWARE_0_TZ_DATE, line 6.
Subroutine __TOCC_EXISTS_head_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_head_tests.cf, rule __TOCC_EXISTS,
line 6.
Subroutine __NONEMPTY_BODY_body_test redefined at
/tmp/.spamassassin25471WRu8v8tmp/20_meta_tests.cf, rule
__NONEMPTY_BODY, line 10.

These weren't fatal, the rules were loaded and amavisd restarted, but
I'm not used to getting output from my script. Is something wrong
here, or are these redefinitions harmless?
--
       -ste

Reply via email to