-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Len Conrad wrote: > With the severe obfuscation of spam images with: > > 1) low-contrast between f/g and b/g and > > 2) random images/edges in the b/g, > > ... how effective is FuzzyOCR in OCR accuracy? With these two factors, FuzzyOcr has not much problems using version 3.5.x. 1) Is covered by binarization, for example in ocrad with the -T percent switch 2) Is covered by the pamthreshold/pamditherbw scansets However, there are other things that don't work as well.. which I won't enumerate here for obvious reasons ;) Chris > > Len > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpRGBJQIKXnJyDxURAicPAKDKgROcf7V3DW+KwqQv+RpsQUStzwCgx5fi gmXbWRwNT8u7XvksJs05X0I= =cEwx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
