Matthew, I never had a problem with a hang. My problem was that it would get 
back
incorrect results. It was making ham as spam when it should not have. I was 
told to
upgrade Net::DNS it to the latest version. I can only suggest the same to you.

Which version of perl and Net::DNS are you running?


Thanks,
Dhaval

Matthew Bickerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> I am having a problem with the Net::DNS module. It just hangs up when trying
> to resolve a domain to get the TXT data for SPF tests in spanassassin. If I
> try to reinstall the module it fail the make test. How did you solve the
> problem?
> 
> Matthew
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 30 January 2007 19:41
> To: Dhaval Patel
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: spamc using different perl
> 
> Dhaval Patel wrote:
> > I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed from the
> Debian packages.
> > 
> > I had a problem with the Net::DNS module a while back and upgrade perl to
> 5.8.8 using
> > CPAN. This upgrade installed perl 5.8.8 as the default perl version system
> wide.
> > 
> > Unfortunately Debconf is not part of CPAN, so I cannot install it in
> 5.8.8. Because of
> > this, certain Debian utilities will not work.
> > 
> > Is there anyway to tell spamc to use perl 5.8.8 and leave the rest of the
> system to use
> > the Debian 5.8.4?
> > 
> > Both versions are currently on the system. /usr/bin has perl5.8.4 and
> perl5.8.8
> > binaries. Currently /usr/bin/perl is the 5.8.8 binary for spamassassin.
> > 
> > Will changing the top line of /usr/bin/spamassassin be all that is needed
> for spamc?
> 
> spamc couldn't care less what version of Perl is on your system since 
> it's written in C.
> 
> All the other programs that ship with SA (spamassassin, spamd, 
> sa-update, etc) are written in Perl.  If you want those programs to use 
> a different perl (and I would suggest they all use the same perl), yeah, 
> you can change the shebang line to point at a different perl.
> 
> 
> Daryl
> 
> 



-- 



Reply via email to