On Saturday 10 February 2007, Dan wrote: > On Feb 10, 2007, at 14:38, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > > How do you ever find FPs if you have so many TP to sort through > > that it's not even worth sorting through FP+TP to find the FP ? > > IMHO, that'd be why we assume that mails are ham rather than assume > > that they are spam. > > I haven't found FP reviewing to be a big deal. In my latest SA based > configuration, for example...
Whoa... Which side of the fence are you on? How can you cite your current configuration of SA as any kind of indication of how hard it would be to find FPs in a totally reversed situation? -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgpUkeMq2M17i.pgp
Description: PGP signature