Is there a consensus on this need? I deal with the seen db issue by scheduled deletion of that file. That said, with SA becoming more and more prominent all the time, I suspect the Average Joe will miss this oddity until they wind up with a sluggish system, out of drive space or other related issues.
I was mostly curious of the logic on NOT doing maintenance on the Seen and AWL db files. If there is a consensus this needs to occur, then perhaps I can take the time to create a proper patch. I just want to make sure I am not missing something fundamental here.... Michael Parker wrote: > Dave Koontz wrote: > >> I am sure this has been asked numerous times before, but what is the logic >> in having auto expiry on the bayes DB, and not seen? Seems that once tokens >> have been removed from the DB there is little to no use for 'unlearning' any >> associated messages. Besides on a busy system, this seen file gets large >> very fast. I'd vote for auto expiry and maintenance on seen as well as AWL. >> >> > > Patches welcome. > > Michael > > >
