Jo Rhett wrote:
Can you explain how this isn't an FP in the standard config?
There's absolutely nothing custom about my config, so what
"standard" are you applying here?
Again, I have a 100% stock SA configuration. Why do I need a
custom rule to work around an FP in the ruleset?
On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Loren Wilton wrote:
No you don't. I wrote that rule. That's why it starts with my
initials. I didn't submit it to SA, and while it I think exists in
SARE rules, it almost undoubtledly has a "SARE_" prefix in that
rule set.
So no, you DO NOT have a standard config, no matter what you may
think.
Now, that said, the forwarded Blackberry message you posted would
not have hit the rule in the first place, unless someone took my
original rule and modified it. So you not only don't have a
standard config, you have apparently locally-modified versions of
rules you have picked up elsewhere. And it is that locally-modified
rule that is hitting on your Blackberry messages.
You're making all sorts of claims that I can positively tell you are
wrong. I have *NO* local customizations to SpamAssassin other than
the use of SA-update to retrieve the recommended SARE rules.
Grepping through the sa-update directories, I find the rule in
3.001007/70_sare_stocks_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net/200702091000.cf
There is no SARE prefix, and there is no customization of the rule
that I can see.
header __RATWARE_0_TZ_DATE Date =~ /\s\+0000$/
meta LW_STOCK_SPAM4 __RATWARE_0_TZ_DATE && MIME_BASE64_TEXT
And for reference, here are the headers of the message. Which
doesn't appear it should match
From: "Jeff Viets, VPI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: February 6, 2007 9:52:29 AM PST
To: "Jo Rhett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: double bubble windscreen for 2nd gen SV?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.netconsonance.com ([unix socket]) by
triceratops.lizardarts.com (Cyrus v2.3.7) with LMTPA; Tue, 06 Feb
2007 09:50:28 -0800
Received: from smtp02.bis.na.blackberry.com
(smtp02.bis.na.blackberry.com [216.9.248.49]) by
mail.netconsonance.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l16HoPQF020967
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:50:26 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netconsonance.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 4.234
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.234 tagged_above=-999 required=4 tests=
[FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=1.052, LW_STOCK_SPAM4=1.66,
MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.522]
Message-Id: <258480212-1170784219-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell00.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sensitivity: Normal
Importance: Normal
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
