Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Assuming this is your score line:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 >
tests=AWL,BAYES_50,HTML_30_40, >
HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3
> autolearn=no version=3.1.8
Then the biggest difference is that my Bayesian scoring gives it a
BAYES_99 score and your's gives it a BAYES_50 score.
So you are saying that I have to train SA?
That would be how you would improve your Bayes accuracy, yes.
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW: http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an
idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us
will have two ideas." -- George Bernard Shaw
