> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: --[ UxBoD ]-- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Using a combination of numerous SA rules, bayes, FuzzyOCR and BotNet on
> a new server Ive just built we are trashing the SPAM.  Attached graph
> is for today :-

What does "received" mean in the graph?

Giampaolo


> Regards,
> 
> UxBoD
> 
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:55:07 -0700, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm doing something wrong but with the various methods of bayes
> > poisoning going on I've found that bayes is just lowering the score
> of
> > spam and causing more spam to get through. Where bayes used to be the
> > centerpiece of spam filtering now I have turned it off to increase
> > accuracy.
> >
> > Anyone else seeing this or is there some new tricks that I'm missing
> out
> > on?
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> > MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> --
> --[ UxBoD ]--
> // PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
> // Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
> // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
> // SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.


Reply via email to