Matthew Wilson wrote: > Hmm. Maybe it is indeed a result of the additional local loopback address > required for the IP load-balancers. I'm asking around various places if > that's a supported situation.
What exactly do you mean by 'local loopback address'? I'm pretty sure I know what you're talking about, but I wanted to make sure I understood you correctly. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unix System Administrator Kansas State University Computing & Telecommunications Services / Enterprise Server Technologies Work: 532-3067 PGP Key: 0x27F4B742 GPG Fingerprint 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
