Hi All,

I would like to note that this problem has been corrected, and was due
to an external automatic updating source.

Thanks for all the help that has been provided.

Regards,
Mark

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:50:52PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> I have changed my reporting template, and now get this information
> 
> Content analysis details:   (4.0 points, 5.0 required)
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
>   0.5 NO_RDNS                Sending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix variant)
>   3.5 VOWEL_FROM_7           Impronouncable from header (7+ consecutive 
> vowels)
> 
> So the whitelisting is definatly not working. 
> 
> A lint of the file shows it is reading the cf file, and I have checked
> the whitelist_from entry is correct a thousand times. Does anyone have
> any idea what could be going on here?
> 
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
> > Thanks, I did run exactly that, and got the output that I posted. Do you
> > have any idea why I might be getting such a limited output?
> > 
> > What do you have set for reporting purposes in your local.cf file?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Mark
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:31:16PM -0500, maillist wrote:
> > > Mark Adams wrote:
> > > >>You could run: "spamassassin --test-mode < message", and see what it is 
> > > >>scoring.
> > > >>
> > > >>    
> > > >
> > > >Hi There,
> > > >
> > > >I have tried this, and get the below result.
> > > >
> > > >------_=_NextPart_001_01C7710E.58A560A4--
> > > >hits=4.0 required=5.0 test=NO_RDNS,VOWEL_FROM_7
> > > >
> > > >This does not show whitelist hits, should it?
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Mark
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > Yes, if you run "spamassassin --test-mode < message", it should show 
> > > something like this:
> > > 
> > > Content analysis details:   (-104.0 points, 7.0 required)
> > > 
> > > pts rule name              description
> > > ---- ---------------------- 
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > -1.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
> > > -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
> > > -3.0 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
> > >                            [score: 0.0000]
> > > 
> > > -=Aubrey=-

Reply via email to