Under MailScanner on an old Fedora Core 1 box here 3.2.0 ran at half the speed of 3.1.8.
I'm not sure what was causing it. Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -----Original Message----- > From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 May 2007 15:05 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: notice diff between using 3.1.8 and 3.2.0 ? > > Yup. Maybe a little too early to jump to conclusions, but since we're > running SA 3.2.0 here (two days ), less spam has made through it. I > have some spam trap accounts set up, and since the upgrade, none of > them has got any messages! (their daily rate varied from 2 to 10 > messages a day). > > As for the performance, I think 3.2.0 is a little bit slower than > 3.1.8. Maybe 20-25% slower. Even with sa-compile ran... But as long as > we aren't a big traffic site, it's completely acceptable due to the > improvement in spam detection performance. > > > Luis > > 2007/5/4, Bret Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Is anyone noticing small, medium, or large improvements in > > > how well 3.2.0 does it's job compared to 3.1.8 ??? > > > > I'm seeing less spam slipping through in 3.2.0 rc3 than > with 3.1.8. Of > > course, that could be coincidental, but I'd rather > attribute it to the > > SA upgrade. > > > > Bret > > > > > > > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------- > GNU-GPL: "May The Source Be With You... > ------------------------------------------------- >
