On Mon, 7 May 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Duane Hill writes:
On Sat, 5 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
[SNIP]
There are a LOT of subtle changes... But for the brave, here is a
tarball.
cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
rm -rf
Untar this there: http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa320.tgz
Just an FYI followup. I have upgraded without any errors. I did notice
sa-compile is not checked in the config by default. I know it is
apparently broken.
really? news to me ;)
Or are you referring to the FAQ?
1) Doing a 'make config' from the port directory, the option for
sa-compile states right after it 'broken'.
2) In the Makefile, it states sa-compile doesn't work on FreeBSD and
Solaris if you elect to use it and try doing a 'make' from the port
directory.
3) Michael Scheidell stated in a response to my message
"And its obnoxious if you try to select it ;-)"
However, your response has prodded me to go "beyond".
I have uncommented the IGNORE within the make file and did a
complete fresh install from scratch. I do get sa-compile to run without
specifying any additional options on the command line. However, I get a
few warning messages:
body_0.xs: In function 'XS_Mail__SpamAssassin__CompiledRegexps__body_0_scan':
body_0.xs:43: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
body_0.xs:51: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
body_0.xs:59: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
body_0.xs:67: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
I also uncommented the loadplugin line in v320.pre for the Rule2XSBody
plugin.
The compiled rules must be active according to the response I received
from starting spamd:
[18036] info: zoom: able to use 309/309 'body_0' compiled rules (100%)
The version of re2c that was installed through an updated FreeBSD ports
collection is 0.11.1 running on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE.
