Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Wednesday, May 30, 2007 1:41 PM Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:33:16PM -0500, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Well, that doesn't show up in the list either...
I haven't really looked at 3.2 in a while, but the rule seems to have
a score 0. A random guess, without seeing the rest of your debug
output, is that URIBL_BLACK is marked as a duplicate of this other
rule (the config lines are identical), and so it gets removed.
Where does this leave us for a fix? Does a bug need to be filed? If so, what
is the root of the cause? Is it the duplicate rule in 72_active.cf or that the
duplicate has a score of 0?
I reopened and retitled bug 5487 about this. I hope to look into it
tonight.
Daryl
