Hi,
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
That's ok, just threw my two cents... Same thing happened to me, and I
tracked it down to the "loading twice" issue, but I never said I had
the truth...
Maybe some extra cf file getting loaded from the updates dir?
Remember, as updates are present, almost everything gets loaded from
there, ruling appart the /usr/share/spamassassin dir and some other cf
files as well...
That is what I was thinking might be happening. I put my question to
the list in the hope that someone might say "whoops! We included a 3.2.0
(which includes ImageInfo by default) in the 3.1.8 channels by mistake...
But I guess if that was happening more people would have piped up by now
:-)
Luix
2007/6/5, Anthony Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anthony Peacock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
>
>> You're probably loading the plugin twice, one from your local.cf or a
>> v3**.pre file, and the other from the ImageInfo.cf. Take out one of
>> the LoadPlugin directives (preferably the one from local.cf or the
>> *.pre files), and everything will go fine.
>
>
> This isn't a new installation of ImageInfo. That has been working
> without problem for ages now. As has sa-update. Just recently
> sa-update has occasionally given this error. Spamassassin on its own
> does not, and in fact sa-update does not give this error every time.
By the way, I am not disputing your diagnosis, that is undoubtably what
is happening. I just don't understand what it is about sa-update that
makes it do this only when an update happens.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Luix
>>
>> 2007/6/5, CHIME System Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> # spamassassin --version
>>> SpamAssassin version 3.1.8
>>> running on Perl version 5.8.8
>>>
>>> # sa-update --version
>>> sa-update version svn507100
>>> running on Perl version 5.8.8
>>>
>>> Sa-update command line run via cron
>>>
>>> /usr/local/bin/sa-update --channelfile
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt
>>>
>>> Channel file:
>>>
>>> updates.spamassassin.org
>>> 70_sare_adult.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 70_sare_evilnum0.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 70_sare_header0.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 70_sare_html0.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 70_sare_obfu0.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 70_sare_random.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 70_sare_specific.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 70_sare_stocks.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>> 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
>>>
>>>
>>> Every now and then I get the following errors from the cron job:
>>>
>>> Subroutine new redefined at
/etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm
>>> line 98.
>>> Subroutine _get_images redefined at
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm line 223.
>>> Subroutine image_named redefined at
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm line 260.
>>> Subroutine image_count redefined at
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm line 276.
>>> Subroutine pixel_coverage redefined at
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm line 292.
>>> Subroutine image_to_text_ratio redefined at
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm line 308.
>>> Subroutine image_size_exact redefined at
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm line 330.
>>> Subroutine image_size_range redefined at
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm line 346.
>>> Subroutine result_check redefined at
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/plugins/ImageInfo.pm line 374.
>>>
>>> I haven't been able to repeat these errors when running from the
command
>>> line, and they don't appear every time the cron job is run.
Because of
>>> this I suspect that they only appear when there is an update
available.
>>>
>>> I understand about 3.2.0 including ImageInfo and possible
conflicts, but
>>> I didn't think this affected 3.1.8.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> System Admin
>>> CHIME, Royal Free & University Collge Medical School
>>> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW: http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"I'm in shape. - ROUND is a shape"
--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW: http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan. For a CAT scan,
they're only looking for one thing, whereas a PET scan could result in
a lot of things." - Carl Princi, 2002/07/19
