Before I put my foot in my mouth to my ISP, I'd like to make sure I'm right. From the headers below, what does Embarq/Synacor consider to be ALL_TRUSTED?
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.embarq.synacor.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECA115F5EC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:32:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-10 required=10 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.embarq.synacor.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp10.embarq.synacor.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-Y1RUpHW7XQ for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:32:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mxintern.schlund.de (mxintern.schlund.de [212.227.126.201]) by smtp.embarq.synacor.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A323615F5A2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:32:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.19.16.7] (helo=home.kundenserver.de) by mxintern.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HyHiW-0000y9-Mu for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:32:12 +0200 Received: from abuse by home.kundenserver.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1HyHiW-0004Kl-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:32:12 +0200 From: Abuse Department <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Fwd: 74.208.53.91 URGENT: Phish Site http://74.208 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:32:12 +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-UI-Msg-Verification: db928a8b4f3b2a34c9e716dce16c42bc Content-Type: X-UID: 3636 X-Length: 4690 -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
pgpl7nsgHx5VW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
