LuKreme wrote:
>
> On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
>> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
>> reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
>> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
>> reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
>
> Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much ham
> for my tastes, and I never found that dsbl was hitting anything (or
> at least nothing that sbl-xbl (now zen) didn't already catch).
>
> YMMV.
>
>
> --
> Everybody hates a tourist, especially one who thinks it's all such a
> laugh. Yeah, and the chipstains and grease will come out in the
> bath. You will never understand how it feels to live your life with
> no meaning or control, and with nowhere left to go. You are amazed
> that they exist, and they burn so bright whilst you can only wonder why.
>
>
>
>
I see, I still get 5-6 spams per day or so, but I have bayes and auto white
listing enabled. The DB so far has 2 hams and 14 spams recorded. I wonder
how long it will take to see some good results from bayes and awl. Will
Spamassassin dump a message if it fits the "spam" characteristcs from bayes?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I-Enable-RBLs-tf3896474.html#a11126246
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
