On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Matthias Keller wrote: > I'm only using the signatures with the spamassassin plugin because I found > them to be too invasive. I dont allow anyone to block a mail at SMTP level > just because it contains ONE sentence. The sanesecurity signatures also > contain a LOT of single sentence rules which are too risky for me... For > example just becuase a mail contains '(ii) Email ticket number' I dont want to > block it.. but it will, according the the current scam.ndb...
Hmm...with amavisd, the return from clamav can be treated like a SA rule. You can score certain returns (regexable) with high scores, and other returns with lower scores. Nobody said anything about blocking mail at an SMTP level because it contains one sentence. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 ---
