You mean my not smoking and never have smoked status gets me drummed
out of the neo-con corps? What will those who know me and think I am
somewhere off to the right of <pick an extreme example> would be
astonished. But then my friends on the right figure I am quite
"squishy" as a "conservative." Ah well. I grew up outside the out group
and I guess I'm still not a pigeon to stuff in a hole.
{^_-}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Raef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wait, would that ban on smoking include cigars too?
Are regular neo-cons okay?
Please delete.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Glomph Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would start by banning Outlook along with attachments.
Why stop there, ban -all- Microsoft products from the internet.
Next, I would ban smoking, unhealthy foods, and moronic neo-cons.
Come on, this is Earth we are talking about.
The whole point of SpamAssassin is to attempt to make ordinary people's
use of
email tolerable again, under the onslaught of crap. SA, along with the
various
external services it employs, does a fantastic job, thanks to a great
bunch of
guys who appear here every day.
_________________________________________
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, John Rudd wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.07.07 18:47, John Rudd wrote:
As I've said for years: we should just ban attachments. They're not
really useful for anything that can't be done a better way. Which
only
leaves them being useful for attacks of one form or another.
some people just want, some just need attachments.
"some people just want" -- yup, no disagreement there. No matter how
many
alternatives you give them, some people just want the ease and
convenience of
attachments.
"some just need" -- no, I can't agree there. I have yet to come
across ANY
situation where a person _NEEDED_ attachments. As I said above,
there's
nothing that can be done with attachments that you can't do another
way.
