On Friday 27 July 2007, Ed Kasky wrote:
>At 09:58 AM Friday, 7/27/2007, Gene Heskett wrote -=>
>
>>On Friday 27 July 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: spamd: processing message
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for gene:500
>> >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: rules: failed to run CG_FUJI_JPG
>> > test, skipping:
>> >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]:  (Can't locate object
>> >method "image_name_regex" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus"
>> > at (eval 761) line 1359.
>> >Jul 27 04:26:53 coyote spamd[10637]: )
>
>-snip-
>
>> >This is a per message occurrence.  What should I check?
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>
>If you did the same thing that I did, it's because when you upgraded
>to 3.2.2, it over-wrote your copy of ImageInfo plugin which has the
>function "image_name_regex" defined.  The version that shipped with
>3.2.2 is actually older than the one from rulesemporium and the cf
>for the newer version has the rules defined that caused your errors.
>
>You have two option if this is the case:
>1.  Disable the rules in your imageinfo.cf
>2.  Re-install ImageInfo.pm from rulesemporium
>
I was able to get the rulesdujour script to run, and it may have updated that 
file, if so, what filedate/version should I see in imageinfo.cf?  Or the .pm 
file for that matter.  I find I have that file 
in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002001/updates-etc, but not 
in the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002002 tree.

>I took the latter path.
>
>And as Matt reminded me:
>"Note to self: don't use RDJ or other update scripts on the rulefiles
>that go with plugins.. Or do anything else that might update one without
>the other.."
>
>HTH
>
>Ed Kasky
>~~~~~~~~~
>Randomly Generated Quote (254 of 568):
>A thing long expected takes the form of the unexpected when
>at last it comes.  - Mark Twain



-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
All Finagle Laws may be bypassed by learning the simple art of doing
without thinking.

Reply via email to