Hi Justin,

Just a note to say I *think* your mods have worked... they're
currently running on a backup SA server and appear to be behaving as
expected.

I'm including the off list posts below so any others that hit this
problem stand a chance of getting an answer. Again, many, many thanks
for your time and patience.

Apologies to all for top posting.

Best to all

Nigel

>yep, unfortunately it'd take a manual build.  if you're not comfortable
>doing that already, it may not be a good idea to start now, it
>can be a little tricky to get the hang of. :(
>If you want to give it a try anyway, it goes like this:
>
>    wget http://.../Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2.tar.gz
>    tar xvfz Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2.tar.gz
>    cd Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2
>    [that patch command]
>    perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr
>    make
>    sudo make install
>
>--j.
>
>Nigel Frankcom writes:
>> Ahh - so I'm guessing I need to pull the tar.gz and run a manual
>> build? My install came down from yum so AFAI can see there's no src
>> dir (at least locate Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2 came back a blank). 
>> 
>> My sincere apologies for taking up your time like this. If you are
>> aware of any reference material I can use I'm happy to do that rather
>> than waste more of your time.
>> 
>> Kind regards & many thanks for your patient help thus far.
>> 
>> Nigel
>> 
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:23:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >
>> >in the source directory ("Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2"), run
>> >
>> >  patch -p0 < filename.patch
>> >
>> >Just apply the 2nd and 3rd attachment, not the 1st.
>> >
>> >--j.
>> >
>> >Nigel Frankcom writes:
>> >> Please excuse an embarrassingly dumb question, but, how do I apply
>> >> that patch? I've never applied one to anything before now. Also, do I
>> >> need to install all 3?
>> >> 
>> >> Red-faced
>> >> 
>> >> Nigel
>> >> 
>> >> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:36:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
>> >> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >
>> >> >could you try adding the 3.2.2 patch from 
>> >> >http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5574 ? it could
>> >> >be some buggy error-handling code is being triggered.
>> >> >
>> >> >--j.


On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:36:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
wrote:

>
>could you try adding the 3.2.2 patch from 
>http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5574 ? it could
>be some buggy error-handling code is being triggered.
>
>--j.
>
>Nigel Frankcom writes:
>>I'm top posting this since bottom posting is pointless. As far as I
>>can tell each mail is being dealt with twice. I'm really unsure what
>>to do; whether my mailserver is the problem or SA. Or, more
>>accurately, what change in the way SA handles headers has caused this
>>problem to appear on my server now (I'm assuming it's idiosyncratic to
>>my server since the list isn't deluged with HELP messages).
>>
>>I tried dropping back to 3.2.1 but couldn't find a port for it
>>anywhere. I'll keep digging and see if I can find one since that
>>didn't exhibit this issue with my server.
>>
>>Any help at all would be massively appreciated since I have a good few
>>customers who are a tad concerned (not least of which being me).
>>
>>I did manage to pull a 3.1.9 version to test but that pretty much
>>'blew up' and refused to accept any connections at all even though it
>>--lint's clean.
>>
>>I really am at a loss and desperately in need of some advice.
>>
>>If you look at the stuff below this bit you'll see pretty clearly the
>>problem I've got. If the dev's need to see raw messages (before SA
>>gets them, let me know)
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>Nigel
>>
>>
>>On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:56:53 +0100, Nigel Frankcom
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi All,
>>>
>>>This morning I upgraded to 3.2.2 on CentOS 64 via yum.
>>>
>>>I'm now getting a copy of all email headers inside the body of the
>>>email.
>>>
>>>Everything --lint's clean and apart from this it's working fine. As an
>>>example I've copied in a list post below I received since the upgrade.
>>>
>>>Any help or workaround suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>>Kind regards
>>>
>>>Nigel.
>>>

Reply via email to