Marc Perkel wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
As opposed to preprocessing before using SA to reduce the load. (ie.
using blacklist and whitelist before SA)
I do not.
(greet-pause of 5 seconds; zen and dsbl as blacklists; local access
type blocks; dangerous attachment filename blocker; and then clamav
with Sanesecurity, MSRBL, MBL signatures; all of those _reject_
messages during the SMTP session before Spam Assassin gets to see them)
Do you check any whitelists to bypass ham around SA?
If SMTP-AUTH or webmail is used, then the blacklists, local access
blocks, dangerous attachment blocker, and spam assassin checks are all
skipped.
I _can_ whitelist different individual addresses from any check, but I
don't.
