Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pawe³ Têcza wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:25:48 +0200: > >> What can you tell about it now? > > I think that's not the point, or is it? You don't seem to have a problem > with detection but with token storage slowness on SQL as these "fuzzy" > mails seem to generate a lot of unique tokens. Is that what you wanted to > get fixed?
Hi Kai, I would like two things: 1. try to speed up my MySQL server 2. decrease a number of unique tokens for "punctuation spam" The first of them is a task for me, of course. But the second is rather Spamassassin's job. I'm thinking whether it's really necessary to keep *all* tokens for that kind of spam... Maybe Spamassassin could save only some part of them? What's your opinion about it? My best regards, Pawel
