thank you for the info one thing though... the html part of the email contains only one image, and that image is -as i mentioned- only around 1300 bytes and its also just 250px of width so this can't be right or is it?
Regards Ludwig Loren Wilton wrote: > >> My mail still gets hit with Spam-scores and i don't know what to do at >> this >> point, maybe you do. > > Getting a few points from SA on most any message is typical, not an > exception. SA doesn't declare somethign to be spam until the total score > exceeds the spam threshold. While this is configurable, the default value > is 5 points. > > >> Old-X-HE-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (2.4 points) > > You only have 2.4 points. Unless someone grossly mis-configured an SA > setup, that isn't a spam. > > >> 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no >> rDNS > > This means what it says. Unless this is a result of the path the mail > took > in testing that is not a normal delivery path, you should see if you can > fix > the rDNS. > > >> 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY: HTML: images with 2400-2800 bytes of >> words > > This is basically saying that the body is largely image. That is a very > typical spam sign, so is worth a point or two, or in this case 1.5 points. > However, as I mentioned above, 1.5 is a lot less than 5, so this should > generally not be noticed. > > Loren > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/is-this-a-bug--trying-to-avoid-beeing-marked-as-spam-tf4511579.html#a12871259 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
