Hello list!
I was under the impression that autolearn was going to start self
learning ham at some point, when enough messages had been processed.
Checking the spamd log I see only no-learning or spam-learning. And I
can't feed anything to sa-learn because we drop spam into oblivion. (The
only spam I can scavenge are the mails that SA didn't catch, but by that
time those mails are in the users e-mail client in a host computer, not
in the server.
I have a spam mailbox that users can forward spam to, but as far as I
know, one can't feed forwarded mail to sa-learn. I use those mainly to
learn myself and write rules accordinly, if necessary.
From spamd log:
----------------------
info: spamd: clean message (0.4/5.0) for simscan:512 in 0.1 seconds,
5877 bytes.
info: spamd: result: . 0 - AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,J_CHICKENPOX_74,RDNS_NONE
scantime=0.1,size=5877,user=simscan,uid=512,required_score=5.0,...........,_*autolearn=no*_
...
info: spamd: identified spam (11.2/5.0) for simscan:512 in 0.5 seconds,
8576 bytes.
info: spamd: result: Y 11 -
AWL,FUZZY_CREDIT,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,MPART_ALT_DIFF_COUNT,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS
scantime=0.5,size=8576,user=simscan,uid=512,required_score=5.0,........,*_autolearn=spam
_----------------------*
My local.cf shows:
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
So, is there any other option that needs to be set somewhere? Because I
don't think that bayes is even being used at all.
Maybe an autolearn ham score threshold or something like that?
Thanks
/Diego
