On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Wes wrote: > We're going to switch to all-manual learning and hopefully > convince enough users to send in spam and false positives to train > it well. Sufficient participation is a big question, but appears > to be the only viable option at this point.
That could be automated somewhat. Hook into your delivery process for selected users and bcc messages that fall outside your desired thresholds to spam and ham boxes, then train from the boxes in bulk at night and clear them. Sort of a middle ground between regular autolearn and totally manual training. Batched autolearn? -- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Perfect Security is unattainable; beware those who would try to sell it to you, regardless of the cost, for they are trying to sell you your own slavery. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 days until Bill of Rights day
