peter pilsl wrote:
> sorry for posting again a question regarding the same topic, but I think
>  I found out more in the meantime and can ask a "better" question.
>
> I've a user [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following entries in my
> autowhitelist:
>
>
>     20.0        (40.0/2)  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=222.253
>     24.2        (72.7/3)  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=85.140
>     -2.5     (-171.5/69)  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=85.126
>     26.9        (26.9/1)  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=212.33
>
> Then a mail from this emailadress from an IP=85.126.x.x gets an
> AWL-scoring of +11 !!!  This does not make sense to me at all.   How is
> this AWL-scoring calculated? It seems almost broken to me.
>
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.2 (2007-07-23) on goldfisch.at
> X-Spam-Level: ******
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.8 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
>         autolearn=no version=3.2.2
> X-Spam-Report:
>         * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
>         * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
>         *      [score: 0.0000]
>         *   11 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
>
> Received: from mail.vhs-archiv.at (mail.vhs-archiv.at [85.126.129.42])
>         by goldfisch.at (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id lBCD1FmU005410
>         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
>         for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:01:16 +0100
> Received: from [192.168.0.199] ([192.168.0.199])
>         by mail.vhs-archiv.at (Merak 8.2.4) with ESMTP id IZF38973
>         for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:00:52 +0100
>
>
> Any help appretiated. I need to turn off AWL by now.
>   
The first thing that jumps out at me is that ALL_TRUSTED fired off. Is
that really correct?

As far as SA is concerned, this message is not from 85.126.129.42, as it
considers that IP to be a part of your network. (otherwise ALL_TRUSTED
wouldn't have fired off).

SA probably considers this message to be from 192.168.0.199, unless
there are other Received: headers further back that you left out.

You probably need to manually declare a trusted_networks setting due to
NAT. (ie: if your SA box resolves goldfisch.at to a reserved IP address,
you'll have a problem with broken trust path).

See also:

http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath




Reply via email to