Henk S wrote:
> I experience the same problem.
> Lots of spam and normal e-mail have X_Spam_Status: "No, score=". And
> X_spam_Flag: "NO"
> But not all. Sometimes it is: Yes, score=7.7 and marked as spam, sometimes
> "No, score=2.0" and ofcourse not marked as spam. Even "No, score=0.0".
> What is causing this and how can it be solved?
>   
Well, it really doesn't help that you've left out any useful details at all.

Scores alone tell me, or anyone else, very, very, little.

At the absolute minimum we'd need: a full X-Spam-Status (with the list
of hits), and what version of SA you're running, and a crude description
of the spam (enough that we'd have a good chance of finding a similar
one in our inboxes).

Even better would be to put one of the messages somewhere that we can
look at it. (ie: pastebin, or whatever works for you).

There's a few hundred different tactics spammers use to evade detection,
which one is affecting your current setup is a mystery to me.

However, I can tell you that the the ones with just "score=" and no
numbers following are likely a messages that were too large to be
scanned. If you're using spamc/spamd, by default messages larger than
500kb aren't scanned. You can change this with a command-line parameter
to spamc, but be aware that scanning really large messages can bog down
SA pretty badly.


Reply via email to