On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:12 -0500, Dan Barker wrote: > My whitelist_from_rcvd tags don't hit. I believe this has been happening > since my upgrade from 3.1.7 to 3.2.3. > > I don't see anything "interesting" in -D, but I can get it to show an error > if I mis-spell it whitelist_fxxxrom_rcvd, so I know (besides the debug lines > saying so) it's parsing my User_Prefs. > > Maybe my MTA is formatting the received lines in an un-understandable way? I > don't know where to look besides: > > User_Prefs: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] gadental.org
Whitelist_from_rcvd only works when the forward and reverse addresses match. That's to keep spammers from publishing whatever reverse address they want (because they are authoritative for the reverse zone) and sneaking right through your whitelist... If gadental is unwilling to fix their reverse zone, you might ask them to publish an SPF record and then use whitelist_from_spf instead.... -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
