On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:26 AM, mouss wrote:
JP Kelly wrote:
Enough is enough!
SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am
spoiled.
I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email
and I've had it.
I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the subject here.
I am not able to write my own rules or regex.
Is there a quick and dirty way to give these spams a higher score?
I am using SA 3.2.3 and these message typically score around 4.5.
show samples. Otherwise, it's hard to know that everybody is talking
about the same spam.
here is a typical example:
------------------------------
headers:
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: She'll Beg for More..
Date: January 21, 2008 10:34:15 AM PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on jpkvideo.net
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,MISSING_MID,
RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.3
Received: (qmail 8030 invoked by uid 110); 21 Jan 2008 08:35:21 -0800
Received: (qmail 7999 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 08:35:20 -0800
Received: from 190.75-207-15.dyn.dsl.cantv.net (HELO
equipo05.cantv.net) (190.75.207.15) by smallgod.com with SMTP; 21 Jan
2008 08:35:19 -0800
Received-Spf: none (smallgod.com: domain at bloggingstocks.com does
not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
body:
------------------------------
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:34:15 -0100
http://google.com//search?hl=en&q=inurl:rhtawy.com%2BVPXL%2BMade%2BEasy&btnI=79547
