On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 19:13 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
[...]
> If you or your company would like to fund the development of it, I'm
> willing to prioritize the work. Seriously. Otherwise, "should have by
> now" does not apply to free software. Especially free software that is
> easily monetized by its users. If the lack of a feature you want
> doesn't bother anyone else enough to implement it the only one you can
> expect to dedicate time or resources to the work is yourself.
As I said before, I'm only a "stupid user" and have no commercial
interest in SA. -- I did however produce a simple "workaround" patch and
sent it to this list already.
> In the case of IPv6 (in SA), none of
> us have had the need for it ourselves or perceived the need of it by
> enough users being greater than the need for other things we've spent
> our time on instead.
The problem here is not the missing of IPv6 support, but the fact that
it makes SA trust random headers.
CU,
Sec
--
perl -le 's,us(?=r),he,,print
if (($_=qq/(*_=*\047)=~y#!perl -e hk #rJust -`neocheat#,*_;
$^X hacker!/)=~s<.*;>;($_=$&)=~y~*~$~,$_;ee)'
