Andrew Wilkinson wrote:
I'm experimenting with Fedora 8 and a miltered sendmail configuration running as a mail gateway (smf-sav, smf-spf, milter-greylist, clamav-milter, spamass-milter). I've configured spamassassin's local.cf with a custom rule. It's a simple regex which checks the 'Received' header on inbound mail for any IP in a specific Class C range, and negatively scores the message with -100 (probably extreme). I'm just trying to ensure these messages are never tagged as spam. I've --lint-ed the rule and I receive no syntax errors. However, messages coming in from an IP in the specified range don't appear to be negatively scored. In fact, the test messages being sent were scored as, say, 2.8 before AND after the rule was put into place. Spamass and spamassassin (as I'm running spamassassin daemonized) were both restarted after rule creation. I've verified the regex is correct, running it though a couple regex testers. So, I guess I'd be expecting the X-Spam header on these messages to indicate a score of -97.2. Am I assuming incorrectly?
Well, first, stop looking at total score, and start looking at the list of rules that hit. Is your rule in the list? If not, it didn't match.

After all, if the message matched your rule, and matched USER_IN_BLACKLIST (which scores +100), they'd offset completely.

However, generally speaking I would expect that to be a rare combination, so I'd expect it to be low scoring.

My guess is your rule is in error in some way.

Did you run spamassassin --lint? (this should run quietly if all is well, otherwise it will complain)

If you use spamd, did you restart it (local.cf is only parsed when spamd starts).

if yes to both above or if addressing both doesn't help:

What does your rule look like? (change the numbers of the IPs if you like..)?

What does the header you're trying to match look like (again, change the numbers if you like.. but be consistent.. )?

Reply via email to