On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:44:13AM -0700, Evan Platt wrote: > >0.4 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML > >0.9 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML > > > >I cleaned up an email template for a client, so the code was more > >streamlined and had less HTML (keeping the same amount of images), but > >strangely this got a higher score. > > > Not sure what's confusing about that. The body of the message is 60-70% > HTML. Or 40-50%.
I think the confusion is about the score. In short, 40-50% HTML (HTML_40_50) is more of a spam sign than 60-70% HTML (HTML_60_70). A possible confusion here is if you're relating amount of HTML to score -- there's no direct correlation, it's all about the statistics of what appears in the message corpus. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "From what I've seen and heard, Texas is an unrepentant meat-lovers paradise. Any place that worships the almighty beef can't be *all* that bad, can it...?" - Michael Steeves
pgpFhEZxO78OK.pgp
Description: PGP signature