I'm staring to see BATV use increasing. Has anyone thought about how this effects whitelists, mta acls, etc? It looks like such things are broken because if an end-user whitelists [EMAIL PROTECTED] and BATV has the mail from as [EMAIL PROTECTED], then that whitelisting has no effect. And since the BATV signature changes, they can't whitelist that even if they new what batv signed address was for that sender.
Any thought about how to resolve this? I was thinking of stripping out the batv stuff to get the senders address for matching but I see different kinds of prvs= addresses out there. Some have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others have [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bobby
