John Rudd wrote: > >> the error is ignored since it has no practical consequence (except >> maybe in some unread log file) > > Unread/unchecked only by half-assed postmasters who aren't worth their > salt, and should thus be fired. > > > A decent postmaster at least generates summaries of traffic ... > > A postmaster who doesn't check their logs in any fashion deserves > whatever they get. > > Clearly, only half-baked providers do the latter. >
Wow ! Aren't you guys proud to be postmasters ! For me being a postmaster clearly is a chore (one of many) to wich I devote an absolute minimum amount of my precious time. BTW firing me is not an option since I'm the CEO of my own (small) private owned company :-) Expecting all postmaster to be highly skilled professionals who have studied all the ins an outs of their system is in my view an unrealistic approach of a world where almost every company has to have an email server. I gladly accept all the qualifications you made about being "half baked" "not decent" etc.. Is there somewhere a list of all the still working RBL's or an easy way for an unskilled neophyt like me to check if an RBL is still valid? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/relays.ordb.org-returning-positive-for-everything--tp16286049p16719502.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
