Tony Bunce wrote:
Hi everyone,

I'm starting to see a noticeable amount of message sneak by spamassassin with 
scores mostly the 3-4 range but some as low as 1 point.

I'm running 3.2.4 with SARE, sough, and Botnet.   We don't use bayes.  Here are 
some samples of messages that have got through:
http://pastebin.com/m16055c85
http://pastebin.com/m52635526
http://pastebin.com/m491c4882
http://pastebin.com/m7c1240f2


Anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks in advance!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Bunce: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Programming Systems Administrator - GO Concepts Inc.
I think in our case, bayes would put these above the top. Without bayes or custom rules, these messages would not be marked as spam currently.

For the first:
Content analysis details:   (5.7 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.2 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP      URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                           [score: 1.0000]
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
                           above 50%
                           [cf: 100]
0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
                           [cf: 100]
0.0 URIBL_RED              Contains an URL listed in the URIBL redlist
                           [URIs: 71.187.15.19]
-0.4 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Reply via email to