On Sunday 20 April 2008 18:39:29 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> A lot of the spam I'm seeing sneak past spamassassin has a blogger url in
> it (this seems to be a new favorite for spammers).

yep

> Can someone do a spam-versus-ham comparison for included links to
> blogger.com

well.... some "independent" research, that was "coincidentaly" sponsored by 
Microsoft sayd it's 95%.
obviously thats crap. it toatally depends on your company setup.

> If it proves high enough, would a rule be possible?

http://sarah.ibcsolutions.de/~aep/sa/30_blogspot.cf

combine that with other rules like SARE_OEM or 
http://sarah.ibcsolutions.de/~aep/sa/50_software.cf

also note that at least for me 100% of blogspot spam comes from dialups. So 
again a combined rule is usefull. (besides xbl is extremly effective)

Bayes is very effective too, since spammers are becomming a lot less creative 
with rephrasing.

> Also, would it be possible to make spamassassin -r smart about reporting
> such links straight to the feedback form here:
>
> http://help.blogger.com/?page=troubleshooter.cs&problem=&ItemType=spam&cont
>act_type=Spam&Submit=Continue

I doubt that helps.  The spammers are just recreating them.


-- 
best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Arvid Ephraim Picciani

Reply via email to