Robert - elists wrote:
Snip........
If anyone has tested HostKarma already... and found it promising, but a
little lacking... I suggest testing it again. It is even better now.
In fact, most DNSBLs do not suddenly come on the scene "perfect". Most
have had MUCH growing pains. Therefore, all newer DNBSLs shouldn't be
judged too harshly at any one point in time. They are somewhat of a
moving target and should be treated as such until they've had time to
reach some kind of maturity.
I don't know if any of you have noticed... but high FP DNBLs are a dime
a dozen... and good DNSBLs that are hitting stuff that other DNSBLs
miss.. and which have low FPs... these are getting more and more rare
these days.
Therefore, I suspect that some of you are letting your weird biases
against Marc (for whatever reason and however much deserved)... cause
you to miss out on a good thing he has going with his HostKarma lists.
Sure, it is fun to make fun of Marc. But don't be fools yourselves and
miss out on a good thing! Some of his ideas that are lampooned really do
work.
Rob McEwen
Rob, Marc, list etc...
Some of Marc's ideas are excellent.
The only recommendation I have is, that if you haven't done it already, that
Marc would please make a email list that people can join to get info and
updates as at one point...
.... the list implementation(s) changed and suddenly everything was getting
marked and rejected.
Obviously in test mode, there wasn't a push notice we could find and so we
didn't test anymore.
- rh
I'm sorry if that happened. However - a lot of what I'm doing could be
done a lot better if people were to pick up on my ideas. I'm good at
coming up with new ideas. I'm not the best one for implementing them. I
get it working generally but others usually do a much better job of it.
I should come up with a list of my own.
