On May 21, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
It sure can and we are using that feature. It adresses all (!) features MailChannel claims to address on the webpage and more. Sure it is I who has to do the researching?

I read every document on their website, and saw zero mentions of this feature. I can't research it further without getting the product here to test, and I'm not suggesting that everyone do this -- just that everyone read the information available.

Moreover BMX can do quite a lot of what you describe without having to slow down the TCP channel too much thereby freeing up ressources. But honestly I do not think this leads to anything.

Look at testing results. Try it out. It's been 99% effective against the botnets on a test system I enabled.

But please do not accuse me or others of not doing research if you are not sure. I did quite a bit of research and even asked for more information (which has not been provided yet). I have not said "it lacks feature x" while you incorrectly claim lacking "features" of other products.


People said specifically that mailchannels was doing "nothing more than qmail does" which is clearly not true with even some basic reading. This clearly indicates a lack of research.

I accept your accusation about my research IF you can please point me to a document on FSL's website which addresses slowing down TCP sessions. I can't find it.

--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness


Reply via email to