Joseph Brennan wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (to someone else):
And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them.
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
so what? I don't know for you, but it takes me more time to write my
body than to edit my recipient list.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
let's get a deal. we don't ask about your mac, and you don't ask about
our header :) is this fair?
don't start this old battle again...
It does have a Mail-Followup-To field, a proposal from 1997 that was not
included in RFC 2822 in 2001, so not surprisingly clients don't know
they should use it. If it was "standardized" in the last couple of
years I expect someone here to educate me :-)
Every now and then, some new people come and ask why a list doesn't set
the reply-to and/or why it doesn't set a subject prefix. please use your
favourite search engine to learn about the controversy before starting
this old battle again.
