On 25.07.08 06:44, Skip wrote: > I thought it might be that and had actually tried that before. I just > tired it again hoping that perhaps I had made a typo and it still did > not work. > > According to the documentation, the trusted_networks settings shouldn't > affect this, but here are mine just in case someone else thinks it makes > a difference. > > internal_networks 192.168/16 > internal_networks 69.89.22.106
looking at your original e-mail (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200807.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) seems that none of machines in Received: header has reverse DNS in the headers, so SA assumes there is none. whitelist_from_rcvd works with reverse DNS, to it doesn't fire here. Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.240.8]) by box106.bluehost.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1KMCUb-0001WW-AU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:53:13 -0600 Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:53:15 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.113] ([68.231.250.115]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id u1tE1Z0062W8SQ4021tEyq; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:53:14 -0400 None of these IP's is in internal_networks so the settings is not taken into account. However since 68.230.240.8 fdDNS is eastrmmtao102.cox.net, you should turn on DNS lookups on box106.bluehost.com. Also, you need mention eastrmmtao102.cox.net or cox.net in the whitelist_from_rcvd, not pelorus.org. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.
