Henrik K schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:40:08PM -0700, Jake Maul wrote:
I get spam like this too. I'd tell you to train your bayes db better,
but no amount of learning these things seems to have any effect for
me- the next one in just just right back at BAYES_50. Mine are also
largely from Yahoo, some from Hotmail.
Check: http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=121929487811982
In 3.2.5 bayes doesn't work fully when there are DKIM/DomainKey headers.
i just recognized
that hotmails spf is not
valid for hard discarding mail
hotmail.com. 987 IN TXT "v=spf1
include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com
include:spf-c.hotmail.com include:spf-d.hotmail.com ~all"
it should be -all at the end in my understanding, with current
spf policy servers will notice a fake but dont block it
additional i noticed yahoo.com adsp dkim record is total
nonsense
dig -t txt _adsp._domainkey.yahoo.com
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P1 <<>> -t txt _adsp._domainkey.yahoo.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2242
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_adsp._domainkey.yahoo.com. IN TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION:
_adsp._domainkey.yahoo.com. 6408 IN CNAME rc.yahoo.com.
rc.yahoo.com. 1008 IN CNAME rc.yahoo.akadns.net.
so its also up to them to fix for beeing usable in antispam
the joke might be, that hotmail is m$ and promoted spf
and yahoo promotes dkim *g
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
