If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why
hasn't it been removed from the configuration via sa-update
before now? That's one of the purposes of sa-update.
Todd
ram wrote:
dsbl has been down for a long long time now
Any more DNS checks is just waste of time
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 11:41 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Todd Adamson wrote:
Would I be correct or incorrect that this will get updated
to our rules through sa-update. If this does get corrected,
what kind of time frame are we guessing at?
No idea here.
And in the short term, if we zero the score for RCVD_IN_DSBL, will
that properly disable the test?
Yep.
