Rasmus Haslund a écrit : >>>> We do business all over the world and I see a lot of fp's on Zen. >>>> >>> in which sublist? xbl, sbl or pbl? and when you say "a lot", how >>> > many? > >>> can you show an example of an IP that you consider as an FP? >>> > > >> I am interested in to, since I had uses <sbl-xbl> and then <zen> and >> > never gotten FPs > >> Greetings >> Michelle Konzack >> > > Well I guess in the end it all depends on how you define a FP. > The way I mostly record it here is genuine emails being blocked. > > Another fresh example from today is 193.173.161.178 from XBL inherited > from CBL. > > From what I can see something on the IP is supposedly trojan/virus > infected, however we are doing a great amount of business with a company > using this IP to send email and blocking their email will cost us alot > of money. >
you'd better whitelist people you do business with. This is not an FP. if they are owned, it is normal to block them. add to this that they don't seem to have skills to setup a correct rDNS, so it is reasonable to say that they don't have any (serious) resources or skills to manage their network, and can thus easily be owned by the miscreants. in short, they are part of the problem. $ host 193.173.161.178 178.161.173.193.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mail.hogendijk.info. $ host mail.hogendijk.info Host mail.hogendijk.info not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)