On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > To be a little more helpful and less snippy -- if you want more detailed > answers, and check if it might be a different bug than the one > mentioned, telling us about your SA version would be a smart first > move... >
I wasn't being snippy. I replied with more information to Daryl's post but I must have sent it directly to him instead of the list. I don't have the exact reply handy but I am running SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) The bug does seem to be very simmilar to bug# 4179 So maybe the bug still exists under different circumstances?
