On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here are some stats for this past weekend comparing Pyzor to other hash > tests: > > 36 CTYME_IXHASH > 38 HOSTEUROPE_IXHASH > 92 GENERIC_IXHASH > 129 NIXSPAM_IXHASH > 218 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 > 256 PYZOR_CHECK > 388 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 > 411 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 > 418 RAZOR2_CHECK > 426 DCC_CHECK > > The only downside to Pyzor is that it requires python rather than perl. > Otherwise, it certainly helps here. > > Bill
I second these results.... PYZOR_CHECK hits ~67% of my spam, and is currently the 12th-highest-hitting rule. BAYES_99, Botnet, and URIBL are better, but for my spam Pyzor hits more than Razor does. Jake
