> On Mon, October 13, 2008 16:39, Henrik K wrote: > > >> meta SPF_PASS (SPF_PASS && !BAYES_99) > > Obviously you can't redefine SPF_PASS on the fly.
On 13.10.08 21:08, Benny Pedersen wrote: > olso that SPF_PASS was newer meant to let any msg throught it was just a > pointer that SPF is not fail I know, and so it should have zero score... unluckily that causes SA not to apply the rule.unluckily even the -0.001 can change spam to ham... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. (R)etry, (A)bort, (C)ancer
