On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:19 +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:04 +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> >
> >> i have tested with another spam message that has a combined score of
> >> 22.5 and it's not flagged as spam.
> >> The full debug log is here:
> >> http://www.heimdallit.be/download/spam_debug_1.txt
> >>
> > Hmm, does that say that a bunch of major RBLs is timing out?
> >
> First, UML is a virtual machine infrastructure. See
> http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
> The timing out is caused because it because when i allow the testing it
> apparently doesn't work. When i specify that dns is available in
> local.cf, then it works as it should.
Unrelated. The debug output clearly shows DNS tests. Thus, dns_available
test and explicitly enabling resulted in the same.
> > Huh. body-points == head-points? Also, shouldn't the sum generally be in
> > the range of total score or less, rather than almost twice?
>
> No idea, i thought it was strange but i can't reproduce it in my latest
> tests with the same message.
"Can't reproduce" either is bad for debugging, or just plain scary.
> > I do have users listed on the whitelist in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
> >> (whitelist_from)
> >
> > No, you don't. Not in the local.cf you pasted somewhere else in this
> > thread. (Also, FWIW, AWL is not related to whitelist_* options.)
>
> I do have them but i removed them from the local.cf i posted because not
> everybody's email is known publicly.
*sigh* Please, if you must remove confident data, either just mask it
by overwriting the real address, or at the very least mention it. In NO
case, however unrelated it might seem, do NOT just silently remove it
and claim that's your config.
> >> Oct 14 10:10:23 loki spamd[1321]: plugin: eval failed: Sort subroutine
> >> didn't return a numeric value at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/
> >> AsyncLoop.pm line 278.
> >
> > This seems *really* odd. Clearly, something's broken.
>
> Yup very strange indeed. After rebooting it doesn't seem to occur anymore.
> The only thing that occurs regarding nan is this:
>
> Oct 14 15:15:13 loki spamd[1393]: auto-whitelist: totscore for
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED], 78.22.1.208) is a NaN, ignored
Looks like NaN sneaked into your AWL before. This is not the same as
getting NaN as a rule's score.
> This again suggests that something is broken with my AWL. I think i'd
> better delete it.
Yup...
> As it seems now, the only thing strange left is the AWL & related NaN.
guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
