Hello, the same here. Typical thing here is that the links are typical written with blanks like
www . something . org Has anyone a rule which is able to validate this kind of URL's against a BL? And as you say: Bayes still comes back with 0-5%. Chris Christoph Petersen wrote: > > Hey guys, > > since a week or two all my mail servers are receiving a massive amount > of emails which passes by all my rules in SA (even Bayes doesn't stand a > chance as the content is written to good). > > I wondered if somebody else has this problem and has some advice > regarding rules. > > Here some of the subjects of these emails: > > - Bist DU mein Traumtyp?? > - Willst Du spass haben? > - Shireen gepoppt. > - Saga direkt gevoegelt hehe > - L0litas wollen es richtig hart > - Myriam naturgeiles Teenie! > > Thanks for your help. > > Best regards > Christoph > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/German-Spam-Flood-tp20045971p20046407.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
